Skip to content

Fix external fts example#504

Draft
urfeex wants to merge 5 commits into
UniversalRobots:masterfrom
urfeex:fix_external_fts_example
Draft

Fix external fts example#504
urfeex wants to merge 5 commits into
UniversalRobots:masterfrom
urfeex:fix_external_fts_example

Conversation

@urfeex
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@urfeex urfeex commented May 11, 2026

This example seems to fail on CB3 a lot recently. This PR attempts to fix that.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented May 11, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 81.12%. Comparing base (f96fe15) to head (bdb103b).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #504      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   76.88%   81.12%   +4.24%     
==========================================
  Files         113        2     -111     
  Lines        6056      355    -5701     
  Branches     2644        0    -2644     
==========================================
- Hits         4656      288    -4368     
+ Misses       1063       67     -996     
+ Partials      337        0     -337     
Flag Coverage Δ
python_scripts 75.90% <ø> (ø)
start_ursim 82.72% <ø> (-1.84%) ⬇️
ur20-latest ?
ur5-3.14.3 ?
ur5e-10.11.0 ?
ur5e-10.12.0 ?
ur5e-10.7.0 ?
ur5e-5.9.4 ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Github actions seem to send keyboard input to the program with a very
high frequency.
@urfeex urfeex force-pushed the fix_external_fts_example branch from ea3a969 to f39093d Compare May 13, 2026 14:50
@urfeex urfeex force-pushed the fix_external_fts_example branch from f39093d to bdb103b Compare May 13, 2026 14:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant